Blessed are the Geeks, for they shall internet the earth

A LETTER FROM LONDON
Ted Doyle 


The midsummer is upon us, and Europe is closed . . . wait, what's that sound?

Why it's a bushwhacking in progress! The mighty Microsoft supply wagon, lumbering through the sleepy summer landscape has been set upon by a war party of eurocrats  . . . Oh, horrors, they've pulled the tarpaulins off and are showing everyone who wants to see big lumps of the cargo of secret API code!

Well, that's how it was supposed to go, but in fact what has happened is that the European Commission, which has been investigating an antitrust matter involving Microsoft's effect on competitors for lo, these last four years,  has now allowed the company time to "consider" its recommendations.

European anti-trust laws tend to emphasise protection of competitors, while US regulators look to protect consumers. A set of "objections" presented to the company are close to the last step before "recommendations" are presented, and compliance demanded.

It must be galling, and confusing, for Microsoft to try to get their heads around this approach to the world -- after all, it isn't easy for those of us who live our lives under the slightly crazed rule of the United States of Europe, or by way of acronym, USE.

The commission said its evidence taken across all industrial sectors and across the European Union, showed Microsoft leveraging its dominant position in the PC to corner the market on low-end servers.

USE investigators carried out a market enquiry which highlighted  Microsoft's non-disclosure of interface information, necessary for competing servers to properly communicate with Windows based equipment, snd its effect on customer choice in selecting Microsoft's server products.

The commission said, "The company's behavior is detrimental to competition on the merits."

USE can fine, under its regulations, any company felt to be threatening "competition on the merits" up to 10 percent of annual revenue, or, in Microsoft's case around $3 billion.

USE regulators also have the power to demand  changes to software.

How do you live with them? Isn't business about killing off competition? Being the only kid on the block? Just ask JR Ewing, Redmond's VP for Shennanigans.

"Waal," Ewing said recently, "people who listen to my advice in bidness, and wise men usually do, will tell you I've always said y'all shouldn't trah ta do bidness over theyar ... s'all commies and dogooders from one end to th'other, but Ah do believe in conversation."

"Yessir, Ah'm goin' to have  a little set me down with that fellah in Italy who heads up thisyur European thang, and Ah am told he is a man with who you can do bidness!" he said, with a slow wink, pulling on his manly footwear.

Oh dear.

In the meantime, Microsoft is said to be "considering" the objections of the commission, and the level of concern in the company is likely to be high.

The company is able to be ordered to release core details of its server API code,
unbundle parts of its windows interface, ensure that competitors are on a "level playing field" and in general behave in a way absolutely in the teeth of its highly proprietary, private and secretive campaign to dominate the IT industry.

If the European Union (sorry, USE) never does anything else before its inevitable descent into a spitting match, with member states heaving brickbats at each other before  the familiar all out war, it will perhaps have bought about an epiphany at Microsoft; a complete change of corporate culture.

Hear that oinking, up there?

TedDoyle@thenetworkadministrator.com

 




 


E-mail your comments to dougchick@thenetworkadministrator.com
            
All rights reserved  TheNetworkAdministrator.com

Disclaimer: The Opinions shared on TheNetworkAdministrator.com are contributed by its readers and does not necessarily express the opinion of the creators of this publication.